Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
Interesting, I've heard that only 2 members of the hunt actually see the kill, the rest have to stay well behind the hounds, that doesn't sound like a very fulfilling bloodlust to me.
|
Interesting as i have seen more than 2 at some of the hunts i was trying to stop. I have to admit i have not been to one lately as i would not be able to keep up but i am sure there will be video evidence on the web if one wants to look.
I will NOT be linking to any here as i have no intention of feeding there exposure for those with a blood lust.
---------- Post added at 21:08 ---------- Previous post was at 21:02 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Well presumably they see the aftermath and the fox running for it's life. The sport is in hunting it down. I still think it's wrong regardless of how many people witness the kill.
A lot has been made of the class issue. Maybe some people object to the practise because of those who participate but that isn't the real reason why this is objectionable. We wouldn't tolerate it if people who may be described as 'working class' took to the marshes to hunt foxes with bulldogs. We don't tolerate people abusing their dogs or their cats. I mean what's the difference other than the amount of ceremony involved?
|
There class has no bearing on it as far as i am concerned, There all equally small brained neanderthals who must kill for there kicks