Quote:
Originally Posted by roughbeast
Now that's a question I always wanted the answer to Chrysalis. I wonder if Ignition has the answer. 
Did I do good? |
No you didn't. Ignition said he has Chrysalis on his ignore list so doesn't see his posts when logged in. You need to quote or repeat the specific text you want answering and hope a) you get an answer and b) that the answer is correct.
---------- Post added at 08:43 ---------- Previous post was at 08:34 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
... the only way to reduce the users is either to move some to another segment, or split the node into smaller nodes. If there is a 3rd way someone is welcome to tell me.
|
They can continue as they are and just let everything go to rats so folks leave. That will eventually balance out as a service that meets the needs of the (remaining) customers.
I suspect that they will be putting their faith in Traffic Management Mk II though as trailed by the man with inside info. If that does indeed sort out the highly overutilised areas it will seriously miff the users causing the problem and they may well end up moving on giving the effect of the old "detrimental use" letters but still allowing the holy grail of VM marketing - "unlimited" to be used in their adverts.