Quote:
Originally Posted by Felim_Doyle
We've established that World News is commercially operated already, so no change there, and that the target audience for World Service is outside the realm of the licence payer, so there are a few options available to reduce costs and source funding from elsewhere:-
- Merge World News and World Service and have them both commercially funded. There would be significant savings to be made anyway by merging.
- Make World Service an internet only broadcaster and do away with the cost of running and maintaining their transmission facilities and satellite leases. You would make a fortune selling off the vast transmitter sites. You could feed a third world country with the crops grown on the land if it were converted to agriculture.
So, you're agreeing that the BBC should be "more autonomous and more business-like" but suggesting that it should have limitless, self-determined public funding with no supervisory body controlling the funding or overseeing how it is spent. Er, no thanks! Anyway, those are contradictory stances. Running an operation on the basis of limitless, self-determined public funding is not being "more autonomous and more business-like". |
I think It would be a bad idea to have adverts on the world service, but making the World service Internet only is not a bad idea, trouble is that a lot of nations have bad or no internet connections
Also The BBC need to control its lisence fee so that it has less interference from the government, how the BBC runs should not be on the basis on who runs the government!