Thread: Ambit 256
View Single Post
Old 03-12-2011, 19:44   #5
Nopanic
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northwest
Posts: 2,249
Nopanic has reached the bronze age
Nopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze age
Re: Ambit 256
See I can't give you business case reasons, but whatever they have documented I think it came down to cost .. and being tided into one supplier ..

This could be the actual reason .. but that would be coincidence.

---------- Post added at 19:44 ---------- Previous post was at 19:43 ----------

I would add though that the VMNG300 fault rate was higher when it launch with 50Mb .. than the Hub or SH .. I had no involvement in the 300 so this is only me looking back at some basic stats, so again is my opinion.
Nopanic is offline   Reply With Quote