View Single Post
Old 24-11-2011, 21:48   #86
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skie View Post
Could VM move to a system similar to BT's? They have the fibre, decent quality copper and cabs in place. They would need to replace all of the kit in the cabs and CPE which wouldn't be cheap of course.
Yes but absolutely no point nor business case. There's already way too much investment in the DOCSIS network. The next big upgrade will be fibre to homes, it moves closer all the time.

---------- Post added at 22:48 ---------- Previous post was at 22:47 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by jb66 View Post
The solution is 8 downstream channels
Upstream bonding too.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote