View Single Post
Old 01-11-2011, 19:38   #60
muppetman11
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Sky or VM for TV???

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexDiamond View Post
For me it was just cheaper to have Sky.

But on a XL tv vs Entertainment Extra level, I think it is unfair to say that Sky is better because of its FTA offering. Sky themselves don't advertise any FTA channels as part of its tv offering that is paid for and they are listed separately.

It is being ignored that VM offer EPL football, pay tv HD content and instant vod in their basic sub for XL tv package, none of which is in the Entertainment Extra pack.
Yes I agree with that point of view regarding FTA channels , Im sure ESPN pulls a lot of punters in for VM.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote