View Single Post
Old 01-11-2011, 12:31   #90
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,896
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: Anti-Wall Street Protests Spreading to Cities Large and Small

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius View Post
Freedom of speech YES. The right to protest YES. The right to interfere in the daily business of that church who has had nothing to do with there protest NOT as far as i am concerned.

As for where do they go, Well thats there problem not the problem of the church, I have already said why dont they camp at the gates of downing street ???
You know full well why they haven't taken their protest to the gates of Downing Street, they wouldn't be allowed. Not only that but there is no room to do so there and their main target are the banks and the stock market located in the City.

Interfering with the business of the church was not their intention but it isn't good enough reason for them to be stopped, because you can use that card as often as you like, protestors will always be interfering with something when they protest.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote