View Single Post
Old 31-10-2011, 12:47   #15
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,776
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: Prince Charles gets to veto government bills

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
Headlines are never a good guide to the facts. Believe me, I know.

That said, when both Grauniad articles linked in this thread are read together, the one thing that is clear is that the Grauniad hasn't got a clue whether these powers of consent are ever actually used, or if they amount to a formality, i.e. consent must be sought, but consent is never withheld.
From my reading it's clear they do not know if he was sought concessions to the bills in order to provide consent. However I think the story is that he would need to provide consent in the first place, as far as I was aware there was only Royal assent which was automatically granted to every bill that made it to that stage.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote