View Single Post
Old 31-10-2011, 12:22   #14
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: Prince Charles gets to veto government bills

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
Headlines are never a good guide to the facts. Believe me, I know.

That said, when both Grauniad articles linked in this thread are read together, the one thing that is clear is that the Grauniad hasn't got a clue whether these powers of consent are ever actually used, or if they amount to a formality, i.e. consent must be sought, but consent is never withheld.
Yes, and that's the rub. This being a formality with proposed legislation never being contested is one thing. If the Prince does contest legislation, it's something that needs sorting straightaway, in a system where the powers of the monarchy are supposedly ceremonial.

But nobody will tell which it is.
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote