View Single Post
Old 31-10-2011, 12:09   #12
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: Prince Charles gets to veto government bills

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
"gets a veto" and "must give consent" are two rather different propositions and it pays to notice which of those terms is actually used in the article under discussion.

Headline:

Quote:
Prince Charles has been offered a veto over 12 government bills since 2005
Also:

Quote:
Neither the government nor Clarence House will reveal what, if any, alterations to legislation Charles has requested, or exactly why he was asked to grant consent to such a wide range of laws.
No information is forthcoming over whether this is a simple formality, or if the Prince has actually requested changes to planned legislation.
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote