View Single Post
Old 31-10-2011, 11:46   #8
Maggy
The Invisible Woman
Cable Forum Team
 
Maggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: between Portsmouth and Southampton.
Age: 72
Services: VM XL TV,50 MB VM BB,VM landline, Tivo
Posts: 40,344
Maggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden aura
Maggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden aura
Re: Prince Charles gets to veto government bills

Quote:
Originally Posted by BenMcr View Post
Actually, why they have to do it is explained here http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/oc...ent?intcmp=239
Quote:
Royal assent is a feature of constitutional law rather than merely parliamentary procedure: it is the method by which a bill that has passed through parliament becomes an act, and it amounts to a formal assent given by the sovereign.
Apart from the special position of property belonging to the Duchy of Cornwall, the Duke of Cornwall has no special constitutional position; he is a subject of the crown like any other. The sovereign and the Prince of Wales are the only members of the royal family whose consent is required for bills that affect their private interests.
So we can be clear that there is no underhand business going on.

---------- Post added at 11:46 ---------- Previous post was at 11:46 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone View Post
Again Prince Charles sticking his nose into things that to be perfectly honest he should not be sticking his nose into.
Try reading the articles before posting.
__________________
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
Maggy is offline   Reply With Quote