[Sirius]

Originally Posted by Maggy J

I make no assumptions about them..I was actually thinking of the group that Cameron was actually talking about,the summer rioters and looters and general law breakers across the country..

You dragged in these particular protesters to the discussion and they are neither rioters or looters.they are protesters and NOT whom Cameron was referring to.

They have broken no laws either..so no need for Cameron to remove any benefit from them.

And lastly life is not as black and white as you would like it to be..If you had your way no one would be able to speak up or out in public from the tone you seem to be adopting.

I have no problem with people protesting, I have a problem with people getting benefits they are NOT entitled to. My point is that if its found that some of the protesters at this camp in London are claiming JSA in another town and that town is not where they are protesting then they are in my eye's not looking for work, Therefor they are not entitled to JSA, If that is the case JSA should be removed whilst they protest in London. Or do you think they should be paid a benefit they are not entitled to.