View Single Post
Old 28-10-2011, 12:42   #67
gazzae
Inactive
 
gazzae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Belfast
Age: 45
Posts: 4,594
gazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronze
gazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronzegazzae is cast in bronze
Re: Unfair dismissal could be abolished

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Deegan View Post
It's quite simple. Most companies will have targets, and those targets will be set at a rate that makes the company money. If an employee falls below that target and they are costing the company more money than they are making. There is no point in any companies employing people like this.

As someone said earlier, having a job is not a right, you have to earn the place at interviews etc, and then prove that you are as good as you said you are. And then you have to maintain that standard.
This is where I'm confused. Can you explain why this can't be resolved using the current disciplinary processes?
Granted it takes time under the current processes but I don’t see a need for change.
gazzae is offline   Reply With Quote