View Single Post
Old 28-10-2011, 00:19   #62
Tim Deegan
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Services: 3 phone lines, 100mb broadband, and TV x2 (including one Tivo)
Posts: 2,128
Tim Deegan has reached the bronze age
Tim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze age
Re: Unfair dismissal could be abolished

Quote:
Originally Posted by mertle View Post
Downside to the issue is those who get redundancies either forced to use it live off so No Dole money paid by government. The other is how many use it to go into there own business.

Its sad state affairs when people think companies can chuck people to scrapheap with out pay for NOT DISMISIBLE actions.

I dont think its about getting rid lazy people its like you said its way to stop paying redundancies.

Its sham horrid dangerious move which will ultimalely hurt Government and economy.

How many people worked for company who sets a target for it to be met by incentives only shift goalposts make it harder to achieve. Loses workers morale thus workers get into mode where they do enough to satisfy they working hard but not going the extra yard as performance target is too hard to achieve. Happened at my brother in law chemical factorry they basically wanted to flog them to death to get production levels.

Fact many workers forced to do to mans jobs for same pay morale can easily go down or up.

If employers want hard work then they should provide carrots it could be a worker wins holiday. Extra pay incentive shares in company or even extra day off. Would say most companies who provide nice incentives dont get lazy workers. Those who have managers who dont treat workers nice are miserable environments which get workers doing just enough.

Before policy change ocurs maybe companies should be educated in motivation for workforce techniques and staff treatment skills.
So do you think that companies should be forced to continue to employ staff whos work rate is so low that they actually cost the company more than it earns??

You haven't been in business have you?

---------- Post added at 23:19 ---------- Previous post was at 23:17 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris9991 View Post
I imagine the next thing they'll think about is Health and Safety at Work. Don't matter if a few more workers die - they were just lazy.

With regards to metrics being used to show who are unproductive, a firm could always choose the one to get rid of the workers it wants to get rid of.
Some people have to be over dramatic don't they.....don't forget there is still human rights under European law.
Tim Deegan is offline   Reply With Quote