Quote:
Originally Posted by chris9991
I guess this proposal could make it easier for a firm just to get of staff in times of an economic downturn. Imagine a building full of staff (lazy or otherwise), just create a reason why they should go and you can dispose of. No need to worry about paying redundancies either.
|
Downside to the issue is those who get redundancies either forced to use it live off so No Dole money paid by government. The other is how many use it to go into there own business.
Its sad state affairs when people think companies can chuck people to scrapheap with out pay for NOT DISMISIBLE actions.
I dont think its about getting rid lazy people its like you said its way to stop paying redundancies.
Its sham horrid dangerious move which will ultimalely hurt Government and economy.
How many people worked for company who sets a target for it to be met by incentives only shift goalposts make it harder to achieve. Loses workers morale thus workers get into mode where they do enough to satisfy they working hard but not going the extra yard as performance target is too hard to achieve. Happened at my brother in law chemical factorry they basically wanted to flog them to death to get production levels.
Fact many workers forced to do to mans jobs for same pay morale can easily go down or up.
If employers want hard work then they should provide carrots it could be a worker wins holiday. Extra pay incentive shares in company or even extra day off. Would say most companies who provide nice incentives dont get lazy workers. Those who have managers who dont treat workers nice are miserable environments which get workers doing just enough.
Before policy change ocurs maybe companies should be educated in motivation for workforce techniques and staff treatment skills.