Cable Forum - View Single Post

Russ · 06-10-2011, 01:03

In fairness the incest thing was before the PG rules.

No, they're definitely bringing Vince back because apparently he went bananas backstage at Raw 2 weeks ago when ADR mentioned his name. Vince didn't want any reminders about him in case it deadens the impact of his return.

I see your point about being overlooked but the whole marriage thing is just so "out there" that I doubt even WWE would insult our intelligence by suggesting would risk giving up his position in the 'family'.

06-10-2011, 01:03	#895
Russ cf.mega poster Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Half in the corporeal, half in the etheral Posts: 37,181	Re: WWE In fairness the incest thing was before the PG rules. No, they're definitely bringing Vince back because apparently he went bananas backstage at Raw 2 weeks ago when ADR mentioned his name. Vince didn't want any reminders about him in case it deadens the impact of his return. I see your point about being overlooked but the whole marriage thing is just so "out there" that I doubt even WWE would insult our intelligence by suggesting would risk giving up his position in the 'family'. __________________ From Jim Cornette: “Ty, Fy, bye”