Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
As previously explained, it is not correct to say that VM cannot identify personnel without information from CF. In the overwhelming majority of cases this course of action would not even be considered. I have nothing further to add on this matter.
|
Good, because it will get you nowhere.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
Hugh IS a member of the admin team and I find it bizarre that he should want to stir things up on a forum that he works on  |
He does not work on here, he gives up his free time as a moderator (not an admin) however he is on the team and if he decides something is not appropriate then his decision will be abided by.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
Re: the individual who was reported. It wasn't a case of doing it to benefit myself, it was a case of doing the right thing to protect the reputation of the company (and at the same time the jobs of the hardworking and loyal majority).
|
I'm sure you feel proud of yourself for being so upstanding in your civic duty. I wonder if you go after politicians in the same way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
I agree that a quiet informal word is initially the best way to deal with problems. In the vast majority of cases, no further action is required.
|
As in this case too. No further action will take place.
The subject of getting VM staffers in trouble over what they post on CF ends
here and now.
Any further discussion on it will see posts deleted and infractions issued.