Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyCalling
You mean VM have been making me break the law by using their SuperHub up until now? Or did they have DFS working before, and have just nerfed that too? I suspect the latter, or many prosecutions would have been happening. OFCOM are not shy.
|
I'll leave that to you to speculate. I don't know as I've never had my hands on a working superhub.
As for Ofcom, they investigate in response to complaints. They don't, and probably can't go round checking everyone's wireless to see if DFS is on or not. Hell, it's hard enough to find anyone using 5Ghz at all let alone fire a radar signal at each one and wait half an hour. But if a license holder files an interference complaint, they'll investigate.
Quote:
|
We've now gone from 18 channels down to just 4. That means VM have just stolen 78% of my 5Ghz channels by remote control. Why? Is this a punishment beating for wanting to be able to transfer data to my new NAS without locking up my Superhub?
|
Who knows why VM do anything they do. Apparently their departments do not communicate with each other.
Quote:
|
It seems to me we have two options to resolve this. Either we take aggressive action against this bullying or we all apologise to VM for pressing them to fix the wireless crashes and beg them to un-nerf our routers, promising never to do it again. There's no point simply moaning on the forums as VM may decide to take 5Ghz away completely if we do that.
|
Heh, an interesting supposition, though again I'll leave it to you. I don't have a superhub, and if I ever get one I won't be using it as a 'super' or 'hub' anything.