View Single Post
Old 03-09-2011, 23:45   #31
alwaysabear
RIp Sweetness
 
alwaysabear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,393
alwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appeal
alwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appeal
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge

Quote:
Originally Posted by pythagoras View Post
What has worthy got to do with it? Espn america is on virgin, they just don't want to pay extra for HD for the tiny amount of people that watch it. And I have to say I agree with that decision. Its a commercial one not a question of taste or worthiness.

Regards

John

---------- Post added at 22:36 ---------- Previous post was at 22:35 ----------



I think you will find they are more representative than the few tens of us that post in these threads.
That is why it would be better For VM to change their package system for those of us who are prepared to pay to see the HD channels they want, then customers like you would not be affected. I paid to watch NASN, so all I am asking for is the same opportunity for ESPNA HD.
alwaysabear is offline   Reply With Quote