Thread: HD Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
View Single Post
Old 03-09-2011, 16:59   #9
HDFootyMan
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Coventry
Services: Virgin Media 1TB TiVo, 500Gb TiVo, TV XL, 60Mb Broadband, Phone
Posts: 1,508
HDFootyMan has reached the bronze age
HDFootyMan has reached the bronze ageHDFootyMan has reached the bronze ageHDFootyMan has reached the bronze ageHDFootyMan has reached the bronze ageHDFootyMan has reached the bronze ageHDFootyMan has reached the bronze ageHDFootyMan has reached the bronze ageHDFootyMan has reached the bronze ageHDFootyMan has reached the bronze ageHDFootyMan has reached the bronze ageHDFootyMan has reached the bronze ageHDFootyMan has reached the bronze ageHDFootyMan has reached the bronze age
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
Quote:
Originally Posted by passingbat View Post
I haven't searched, but surely there was an existing thread similar to this that could have been used (it comes up so often)?

For the record, I'm against an extra HD charge on VM. Free HD is a selling point for VM and although we have to wait longer and have fewer channels than Sky. Keeping HD free, works for me.
I agree with the Batman.

The 'Free HD for no extra charge' has been a good USP for VM, if they did introduce a HD charge, that will only encourage channel providers to ask for even more money for their HD content.

Given enough time, we'll have a "Should Virgin increase the cost of their HD charge?" thread, after Sky announce that Virgin want Sky Atlantic 2 HD on the cheap.
HDFootyMan is offline   Reply With Quote