View Single Post
Old 23-08-2011, 23:12   #19
Hugh
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Mod
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 69
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 44,035
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Re: The future of pay-television

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu View Post
To me the cost of the pay tv is far to expensive, what we have to have is several companies that do the same product.

At the moment l pay nearly £80.00 per month for Sky and £65.00 for VM, there other options but the services they provide are not good.

In this climate at the moment Sky have frozen there prices till 2012, but that l think is because people would move to VM. When you think that purses are now being tightened l feel that the future of pay tv is poor, as people no longer have the money.

You have to be competitive, but l think Sky are wiping the door, and there are no plans to revise pricing. At the moment we have Freesat, Freeview, BT Vision and a new one soon Real Digital, but in about two years who will still be around, that's anyone's guess.
it's too expensive, and you pay £145 per month, or £1,740 per year - there is a very simple solution....

£145 per month on TV!
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.

If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Hugh is offline   Reply With Quote