View Single Post
Old 15-08-2011, 21:30   #45
muppetman11
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Virgin Media sells UKTV stake to Scripps for £339m

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
The overnights are as accurate as they ever were. They tell you how many people watched any given programme as it was broadcast.

The consolidated figures, which are the ones you get from the public part of the BARB website, are the ones that claim to allow for time-shifting, and I suspect what you actually mean is that the consolidated figures are more questionable because they can't yet measure online catch-up, only catch-up via TV.

There may be some truth in that, however, the BBC does from time to time release general, aggregated stats for the iPlayer and while it's not often possible to see how a specific programme has been accessed, it is definitely possible to say that while iPlayer is impressive, its not generating the sorts of figures that would justify the claim that BARB's figures "aren't accurate anymore which remains a FACT".

It's not a fact, even if you put it in caps.
Thanks for educating me
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote