Cable Forum - View Single Post

New to cable · 15-08-2011, 19:42

OK The top VM tv package gives you all none premium HD and ESPN but still its seems to VM customers on this site its not enough.

As a Sky customer the same would cost me

All basic tv packs £24.40
HD £10.25
ESPN £12

But VM customers get this for £30 as a standalone package. So I ask in order to get all you get now plus a few extra HD channels would you agree to your subs rising by £16 a month?

Probably not eh, VM customers constantly moaning on this site need to understand what they actually do get and how much value VM are giving them.

So in order to get Sky atlantic would you agree to a price rise per month? Maybe only £2 or £3??? Virign can only keep absorbing the cost of new channels for so long.

15-08-2011, 19:42	#1
New to cable Permanently Banned Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 352	Should VM have charged for basic HD. OK The top VM tv package gives you all none premium HD and ESPN but still its seems to VM customers on this site its not enough. As a Sky customer the same would cost me All basic tv packs £24.40 HD £10.25 ESPN £12 But VM customers get this for £30 as a standalone package. So I ask in order to get all you get now plus a few extra HD channels would you agree to your subs rising by £16 a month? Probably not eh, VM customers constantly moaning on this site need to understand what they actually do get and how much value VM are giving them. So in order to get Sky atlantic would you agree to a price rise per month? Maybe only £2 or £3??? Virign can only keep absorbing the cost of new channels for so long.