View Single Post
Old 15-08-2011, 15:55   #16
muppetman11
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Virgin Media sells UKTV stake to Scripps for £339m

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave42 View Post
sky have a history of witholding channels so it a fair guess who fault it is and they made it clear from the start and before it launched it was a sky exclusive so they had no intention of letting vm have it maybe after they change there packs in september they might let vm get it we have to wait and see i guess
While I agree with you , can you blame Sky they have pumped billions into their channels over the years so a period of exclusivity seems reasonable. Let's not forget when Sky started out they took massive risks , VM had their own channels and had developed Living HD into quite a decent one hence why Sky bought them. VM took the option to be just a platform rather than a broadcaster they had the chance to develop a good channel range but instead sold up , some think this was right others don't.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote