Thread: 125M 100mbit?
View Single Post
Old 13-08-2011, 01:32   #7
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: 100mbit?
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Maximus View Post
if you can get 55mbits per channel (which i didnt think was possible) and you have got 4 channels on the vmng, why are VM flapping that we need the superhub to run 100mbit and eventually 200mbit?
I've said a hundred times, you don't need the superhub to run 100mb or 200mb. VM just want it that way.

---------- Post added at 02:32 ---------- Previous post was at 02:32 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rexz View Post
I thought the superhubs were capable of 400mbit, so that would make me believe that 8 channels of 50mbit would be correct?
It's capable of locking on 8 downstreams but only able to process/route 320mbps.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote