Thread: Riots
View Single Post
Old 10-08-2011, 08:03   #704
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Mod
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,942
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius View Post
Is it because we have pandered to the wishy washy libs and are only allowed to talk and slap the hands of those involved. Why is it that in a interview last night the **** they were talking to quoted they could no longer do anything to him other than shout at him and he said i could live with that. He also said that i would not be punished because the law is on my side !!!!!.
To be honest I am not going to put much faith in some looting idiot's understanding of the law. Which law is 'on his side'? I am pretty sure that their are any number of laws which are not on his side. Looting is a crime, violent disorder is a crime, what laws exactly are on his side? The police didn't go in because the law prevented them from stopping violence, they didn't go in because that's the tactic they took against the riots - probably because they were outnumbers.

Quote:
We need to remove the weak arsed laws that we have been conned into by liberals who say we cannot punish kids and go back to the short sharp shock treatments including the use of borstals for those under 16 and JAIL sentences for the older *******s.
Which laws?
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote