Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
Lets see what the next 2 quarters do and also lets see what virgins tv plans are for the rest of the year before passing kneejerk reactions.  |
I agree as the product offering should be an absolute killer - they now have the best TV and the best superfast internet. The only thing they can get wrong is price, especially considering their continuing problems with negative brand equity.
---------- Post added at 16:36 ---------- Previous post was at 16:34 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pauls9
Not sure what it's like these days, but banks used to put up with unprofitable student accounts, knowing that if they treat them right, the students will turn into very profitable customers in future. Perhaps VM should follow this logic?
|
I agree and I think to be fair with their 9 month contracts they do this.
---------- Post added at 16:48 ---------- Previous post was at 16:36 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horizon
I agree.
The competition commission is to report next month into Sky's dominance over first run Hollywood film rights. Sport and films are what drives subscriptions. If vm cannot get their hands on Sky's films at a better rate and/or launch their own film service, as Berkett has always wanted. Then VM will never grow tv subs much beyond what they are now.
|
Although whingeing to the regulators to give them more Sky channels is a bit pathetic. They have an exclusive monopoly for cable in the UK, one day, when they are rolling in profit, Ofcom is going to expect some payback.