View Single Post
Old 21-07-2011, 21:26   #894
Flyboy
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
Flyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful one
Re: [Update] The News Corp scandal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
So Cameron should apologise for hiring somebody who has not been found guilty of anything, only charged? And he has stated that if Coulson is found guilty, he will come back and apologise.

What happened to "innocent until proven guilty"?
Again, this has little to do with his time at Downing Street (I am sure if there was any nefarious activity we will be informed as time goes by), but more to do with the reasons why Cameron ignored the warnings and advice he was given not to hire him. Any responsible CEO of a large corporation would have heeded such misgivings and steered well clear of him, but not Cameron and we as a nation deserves an answer as to why he did it. We are also entitled to know about the conversations he had with the executives at News International. Conversations we now know happened, because Jeremy Hunt has confirmed these conversations took place; despite the Prime Minister continually prevaricating about them.

Why allow your stooge to "let slip" about them, instead of coming clean yourself.
Flyboy is offline   Reply With Quote