Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Is this pseudo-intellectual nonsense supposed to mean you think that Gilmour was not responsible for the things he was accused of?
|
Its not pseudo-intellectual, its simple truth. The fact that you cannot see it, actually says more about you than I ever could.
You think it's fair to send a kid to prison for 16 months for chucking a bin at a stationary vehicle? I find that utterly shocking, how anyone could be living in our society, apparently living among us and yet can demonstrate such an appaulingly cruel lack of judgement is simply beyond me.
We have rapists and paedos getting less than 16 months, and you think it's fair to completely ruin this kids life because he got caught up in the moment? If you head out into just about any city centre near pub closing time, you're bound to see worse than a bin getting chucked.
The judge decided to make an example of Mr. Gilmour, to send a clear message to others, not because of what he did.
And then there's that other chap who keeps bantering on that he would've given the kid 5 years. You people are completely out of your minds.
Were you lot ever young? Have you never gone a bit mad and did something you later regretted? I bet you have, just as well for you there wasn't a camera there to record it, eh? Or is it one rule for yourselves, and another for students I wonder?
"Judge not, lest ye be not judged."
The measure of your judgement upon others will be the measure by which you will one day be judged.
And if not, then it bl**dy well should be !