Quote:
Originally Posted by kwikbreaks
The Superhub is 20.5x19x5. The stand is 6 wide but the effective width is greatly increased by the connector placement esp if (like me and the VMNG300 in the photo) you have an attenuator in the coax. The VMNG300 is 16x14x4 and also looks more "designer" than functional. It would have benefited from some holes on the bottom to make it wall mountable.
|
NTL 256 - 11x12x2 = 265 cc
VMNG300 - 16x14x4 = 896 cc
'superhub' - 20.5x19x5 = 1947.5 cc
They all do the same thing (once 'superhub' bridge mode finally escapes). What happened to electronics getting smaller?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenMcr
Not much bigger than the VMNG300 modem it replaces
|
I don't think more than twice the size counts as 'not much bigger'!
I have a 5 year old laptop that works out at 1937.5 cc. It has everything you'd expect a laptop to have, including Wifi, and its still smaller that a 'superhub'. What, exactly, is in that case that requires so much room?