Quote:
Originally Posted by horseman
With VM's current configuration :
3 d/s bonded channels = Cisco 10012
4 d/s bonded channels = Motorola BSR 64000
Which is better for what?
BSR 64k is newer kit and can utilise TX32 decoupled downstream modules and RX48 decoupled upstream modules which can gives better flexibility for scalable expansion, smaller physical,power consumption and improved cost/bandwidth profiles.
However it depends on when and how much VM are deploying - you need someone like Igni to give a more authoritative and comprehensive outline of what is out there and how VM are likely to utilise it…..
I only asked whether you might be on Moto kit because of the flat delay line on your u/s capacity that seemed (in my very limited experience) uncharacteristic of Cisco, but obviously the u/s load on your port must presumably be (very) low….. 
---------- Post added at 08:31 ---------- Previous post was at 08:24 ----------
….and just to "muddy-the-waters" further a significant difference between single and multistreamed test could also be indicative of congestion! |
thats quite interesting, I presume my area will be moved to motorola when the 100 mb comes here?
Also what was interesting about my upload stats earlier on in the thread; I'm curious!