View Single Post
Old 29-06-2011, 15:02   #16
dave6x
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Andover, Hants
Services: VM BBL 3Mb> 10Mb> 20Mb> 30Mb> 50Mb> 70Mb
Posts: 732
dave6x has a reputation beyond reputedave6x has a reputation beyond reputedave6x has a reputation beyond reputedave6x has a reputation beyond reputedave6x has a reputation beyond reputedave6x has a reputation beyond reputedave6x has a reputation beyond reputedave6x has a reputation beyond reputedave6x has a reputation beyond reputedave6x has a reputation beyond reputedave6x has a reputation beyond reputedave6x has a reputation beyond reputedave6x has a reputation beyond repute
Re: ASA bans 'Stop the Broadband Con' campaign

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick Fisher View Post
The cost per customer should be decided on a 'what is actually recieved at the premises' basis rather than a 'what might be recieved if you live in the exchange or if your area wasn't over subscribed' basis.

After all, as far as I am aware, the quality or fit for purpose standard, is the purveyors sole responsibility. Why should ISP's get away with selling products of a not fit for purpose quality at full price.
I'd be happy with that as I'd be paying VM less than half of what I do now for my seriously contended 10Mb/s "fibre optic broadband". It hasn't always been like this, a few years ago it was rock solid, but has deteriorated to 2Mb/s - 5Mb/s at peak times!!!
dave6x is offline   Reply With Quote