View Single Post
Old 28-06-2011, 19:12   #15
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: What happened to the 200Mbs trial?

Quote:
Originally Posted by linwelin View Post
June: http://tbbmeter.thinkbroadband.com/g.../376387890.png

that's my chart for this month so far, not allot of usage is it ?

May: http://tbbmeter.thinkbroadband.com/g.../954402870.png
That's a single computer's reading. It doesn't measure how much you've sent or received over your internet connection in total. Unless you only have one computer and it's directly connected to the modem, it's not accurate.

---------- Post added at 20:12 ---------- Previous post was at 20:10 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by TJS View Post
Could be a ridiculous suggestion; but why don't they just do an unmetered broadband if the cables can handle 1.5 GB/s if all connections were unmetered then there should be shorter congestion times (as long as P2P is monitored in some way) because any downloads should be able to finish super fast so it would only be bursts of traffic?
The cables may be able to handle 1.5GB/s but that's shared between hundreds to thousands of users. If one person got full access to all capacity on the cable they'd rape the service for everyone else.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote