Quote:
Originally Posted by Masque
Well again that shows how little you actually read other peoples posts but that is pretty normal for you. 
The 2nd Superhub will look identical and perform in the same way but will be built by a different manufacturer obviously with a different chipset with an identical interface to the present Superhub but the will be no option to get one over the other.
This is no different to us supplying the Ambit 256 and EPC2100 alongside each other as in the past, 2 modems giving virtually identical levels of service.
So next time rather than posting inane rubbish do read about the subject first as that will prevent you spouting rubbish once again, Oh and this time try not to spit out the proverbial dummy like you did last time. |
Incorrect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Masque
nother version of the Superhub which will look identical and perform in the same way as the existing model by which time modem mode will be on both devices.
|
Incorrect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Masque
The will be very little difference and both will offer the same performance and identical interface.
|
Incorrect.
So once again instead of admitting you're wrong, despite a dozen people in multiple threads disagreeing with you, you insult people and change your story. Pretty normal for you.
As per everyone else, flashing your router is not risky, if it were, VM would not routinely roll out firmware updates and flash your router remotely without asking or checking with you. If you do it yourself and mess up, you still have the reset button and recovery mode; and you know when to not reset or unplug it. If VM do it remotely and mess up they don't have any of that, but don't care because it's so unlikely to fail it doesn't matter. That's how low risk it is.