Quote:
Originally Posted by Kymmy
Only if you can do the pings both at exactly the same time is the result relevant  The internet traffic along said route can change from second to second changing your results.. |
ok I see the position is to be obstructive then thanks for making it clear.
I know all about changing conditions and such but internet routes if not congested do not change from second to second by more than a few ms.
I also always do repeat tests so if I was to post 2 traceroutes you can be sure it is something I have done at least 3 or 4 times and the post would be representative of the average at that moment.
By saying I or others cannot post traceroutes or ping times showing the affect the superhub has on the internet I feel CF has lost it and is no longer a neutral forum.
Saying things like traceroutes cannot be trusted because of changing conditions etc. is the sort of thing an isp would say to defend a poor network.
Even VM's own forums dont apply this much censorship to the superhub. Banning users, and forbiding traceroutes been posted.
Of course VM's network which is congested does have changing conditions which is the exact reason I will do multiple tests, do you really think that the fact me and others after using both devices for months and my graphs showing obvious increases of latency is talking rubbish and the network just happens to change its behaviour every single time I change the device, maybe you suggesting there is some guy flicking a switch everytime chrysalis puts in the superhub?
For your information I have used traceroute's alongside other tools to diagnose network problems for many years, this is the first time someone has tried to discredit in such a fashion of 15 years of using the internet.
---------- Post added at 14:44 ---------- Previous post was at 14:28 ----------
here is some data, not a traceroute so not gone against a mod.
Did VM flick a switch or did the network suddenly change behaviour when I swapped the modem