What I'm suggesting is that unless you can ping the exact same site from the exact same location using the two different set-ups (superhub and non-superhub) then the result will be skewed by the differing states of the existing traffic/route for the difference in either time or location.
You can talk all you want about latency but pinging round the world and constantly posting said results doesn't add anything relevant to the latency discussion.. Or is anyone suggesting that skewed results are relevant or that the pings are static depending on route???
What really needs to be done is close local pings that can be done with minimum effect from other internet traffic which will measure the latency of the devices involved otherwise you're just measuring the variability of the routes..
So please guys keep it relevant