Thread: Anyone actually been cut off/restricted because of the Detrimental Usage?
View Single Post
Old 13-06-2011, 23:00   #38
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Anyone actually been cut off/restricted because of the Detrimental Usage?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
also could queue up a large file in a ftp client again and again and set it to auto overwrite when it repeats.

nice link you posted, you got one for upload also?

I was going to saturate my upload to boost my UBR's utilisation to escalate an upgrade but it seems I may not need to now as VM seem to be doing some work on it.
I could easily run up 200GB/day or more with my offsite backup if I felt like it. Not business use, not illegal, not useless, and something I would usefully like to do but can't because of VM's Unlimited* service.

* Subject to arbitrary limits we won't tell you about.

Actually the fact that I can pay £20 for 6TB of bandwidth a month at 100meg vs. VM's £35 for ~350GB/month at 50 meg is pretty shameful.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote