Thread: 125M Vmng300
View Single Post
Old 13-06-2011, 16:33   #743
zekeisaszekedoes
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hampshire, UK
Age: 42
Services: 30Mb Broadband (XL), 2TB TiVo (M+), Samsung Galaxy Ace (M), POTS Landline (M).
Posts: 823
zekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vmng300

I think VM are having trouble getting full 100Mb down/10Mb up across their network, so it's probably not the modem's fault, and I seriously doubt the superhub will improve things. Best you can hope for is the same performance, although from what I've seen baseline latency goes up on the same line when using it so your ping time might go up a little bit (typically ~10ms). ALso if by D-Link you mean the DIR-615, typically the best it can manage is 85-95Mbps on the WAN side so I'd recommend going for a third party router which has gigabit ports.

If I were you I'd leave the superhub unregistered in the box until you absolutely have no choice to use it. Trust me, people replace the superhub with the VMNG300 not vice versa for a reason.
zekeisaszekedoes is offline   Reply With Quote