Thread: Superhub Superhub Firmware Beta Test
View Single Post
Old 31-05-2011, 19:09   #393
zekeisaszekedoes
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hampshire, UK
Age: 42
Services: 30Mb Broadband (XL), 2TB TiVo (M+), Samsung Galaxy Ace (M), POTS Landline (M).
Posts: 823
zekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test

Quote:
Originally Posted by zerolight View Post
The superhub is a decent router, but it doesn't have a great wireless range
To be honest if a home router has wireless on it and that wireless radio is poor in terms of range and stability, I don't think you can call it a great router. I fail to see how the superhub is simplifying people's home setup when a lot of them are running a second router purely because they need better wireless, or when people put it into bridge mode and use it as a modem, still requiring another router. I still think it would have been better to stick with separate modem/router for all customers, rather than have a bunch of them using a third party router plugged into the superhub regardless of whether it's in regular (modem/router) mode or bridge (modem only) mode. Doesn't seem like it would be saving money, or energy or anything.

It's all very confusing...
zekeisaszekedoes is offline   Reply With Quote