View Single Post
Old 29-05-2011, 11:12   #85
muppetman11
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: sky vs virgin media

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlwaring View Post
Why are you using commas instead of apostrophies? Have you gone off them for some reason?

---------- Post added at 10:10 ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 ----------


And how many of those require a Sky subscription? Not that many, from what I can tell.

So FTA satellite has more channels than VM? Yes, but then anyone can launch a channel on satellite.

Sky has more channels than VM? Again, yes, but not that many.
What does FTA have to do with it , they are still available with a Sky receiver and not on VM networkn, and plenty of them require a Sky sub.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote