Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
l have to dispute with you as first of all Sky has a few more channels then Virgin which some of us want but then that is equalised by Virgin,s far superior video on demand and then of course there is the far superior tivo box which Virgin have and Sky can never have but the one thing l do agree with you on is Virgin,s Champion,s league broadband compared to Sky,s non league broadband. 
|
Why are you using commas instead of apostrophies?

Have you gone off them for some reason?

---------- Post added at 10:10 ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by muppetman11
Carl I'm not trying to say VM isn't a good offering but there are more than a few missing channels see Jameseh list...
|
And how many of those require a Sky subscription? Not that many, from what I can tell.
So FTA satellite has more channels than VM? Yes, but then anyone can launch a channel on satellite.
Sky has more channels than VM? Again, yes, but not
that many.