Quote:
Originally Posted by zekeisaszekedoes
Semantics eh? Wonderful thing(s).
Another way to look at it would be there are half a dozen people eloquently and thoroughly describing the flaws in the product in great detail, and many dozens of others shooting the odd piece of dialogue into the proceedings, often agreeing with the standpoint of it being an inferior product, but not being visible enough to qualify as "the usual suspects".
Like I said, semantics. Selective interpretation.  |
I am not arguing semantics. Just figures..
I am also not arguing that it's a good product. It's not. It has faults. If those faults are fixed, it could be good. I would also like to see VM offer a choice of modem or superhub (not all of us need another router).
However, if I were arguing semantics, I could argue that certain members (on both sides) are trying to browbeat other members into agreeing with them.