View Single Post
Old 23-05-2011, 13:34   #184
mertle
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,134
mertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quads
Re: End of the world, Saturday, 21st May

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius View Post
Would you feel that the other side of the world when it impacted.

Wonder though has the earthquakes increased lately more to the point got more bigger.

If they have could mean mother earth is angry.

I would think rather than asteroid although its a worrying likely scenerio. I see the end being that we would see increase of events. Those events I would think earth would be come more increasingly violent too in magnitude ie earthquakes would be bigger. Just everything would get more violent cyclones, turnados, hurricanes, volcano's, earthquakes, tusami's. Not all necessary in one area either.

We would not necessary put 2 and 2 together that it would be all linked until its too late. The problem though we would be pawns who would not be able to avert it but not even despite governments want to belief be the cause of it. Now yes polution may say knock few years from it happening on our watch but the end game would still happen. I would say wars/nuclear bomb tests do more damage than the mere mortal being but governments wont admit to that.

That to me would be most likely way it would end for us.

Not necessary ice age but increase activity might trigger melting icecaps.
mertle is offline   Reply With Quote