Quote:
Originally Posted by Masque
Well this thread is just a VMNG300 worship thread which in reality is going nowhere.
|
That's pure exaggeration; most of the previous half a dozen pages have been stating categorically that the VMNG300 is better than the Super Hub because it works perfectly. That's all. It's hardly lauding it as the be-all, end-all of networking equipment.
Besides, even if it were that kind of thread you could choose not to read it. That would solve the problem, rather than your unrelenting broken record restatement of VM policy facts, or self-important "well I think it should be done this way" rhetoric.
If the Super Hub worked properly no-one would care for the VMNG300, I'm sure. But it doesn't. So here we are.