Thread: Possible Bug in VMNG300 firmware?
View Single Post
Old 15-05-2011, 17:53   #16
craigj2k12
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Stafford
Posts: 4,225
craigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appeal
craigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appeal
Re: Possible Bug in VMNG300 firmware?
Quote:
Originally Posted by zekeisaszekedoes View Post
About the only bug I can find is that it says "Channel Id" on downstream (I have 93-96), then the correct "Channel ID" on the upstream (5). Hardly a dealbreaker.

Although now I look closer, upstream power level is rated 57 dBmV, is that within nominal range? (Downstream is ~-0.3 for all four.)
shouldnt be above 55
craigj2k12 is offline   Reply With Quote