Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
I can see the reasoning behind the superhub, but the common sense idea would have been to keep the vmng300 as an alternative alongside it. I am sure many would agree with me on that.
Only time will tell how VM handle the situation with people who refuse to use the superhub, because historically VM have backed down when it comes to churn.
|
If they are going forwards with a a new Superhub then the will be no return to the VMNG300 especially as modem mode will be out sooner than any return to the VMNG300 would even be possible, which would make a reprise of the VMNG300 rather pointless and not cost effective.