Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
I agree and was a basis of my argument to have kept the vmng300s alongside the superhubs. The curiosity remains tho as it looks from here this 2nd vendor wasnt in the drawing board from day 1.
|
It was, it's been part of the project from the beginning.
Quote:
Originally Posted by _wtf_
That makes perfect sense BUT why wait several months between the first being released and the second almost being announced?
The VMNG300 was around what 4 years(?) what was the other one at this time?
|
The Ambit 256 was the modem of choice and the VMNG for 50Mb only, the Superhub development was longer than expected and was married in with the 30Mb release. It needed to be safely in place before this was announced.
There were also a number of other modems, the ECP, 5100, etc ..