Thread: 125M Vmng300
View Single Post
Old 13-05-2011, 23:18   #367
Nopanic
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northwest
Posts: 2,249
Nopanic has reached the bronze age
Nopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze age
Re: Vmng300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
here.

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/35233241-post170.html
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/35232979-post161.html
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/35232982-post162.html

Combined with the numerous postings that you only have one supplier at once. I concluded its been dumped, or are you going to have 2 suppliers for the superhubs breakng historical trend?

---------- Post added at 00:14 ---------- Previous post was at 00:13 ----------



thanks for clearing that up, you should have done so earlier because in the last 2 days there has been more than a dozen posts on it and you didnt dispute any of them until mine. So they not dumped but I am still wondering why VM have felt the need to go dual vendor when previously they have been happy with one.
It makes business sense to have two, otherwise Netgear will control VMs ability to offer Broadband ..
Nopanic is offline   Reply With Quote