View Single Post
Old 12-05-2011, 17:28   #103
muppetman11
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
VM tend to only increase the prices when they have to. ie when Sky raise their prices.

What channels were lost recently?

As I tried to say earlier, my Gas and Electric have just gone up in price again even though I am still getting exactly the same as I had before, or I used to pay 35p for a mars bar and yet now its 55p and its actually lighter and smaller than it used to be. Should I demand they increase the size inline with the price increase?

---------- Post added at 16:26 ---------- Previous post was at 16:25 ----------


This has nothing to do with me working for VM at all. I am posting my own point of view on the subject and I don't agree with the postings of VM put up their prices so I want more channels, that a few people seem to keep posting.
How long are VM staff going to flog this line of blaming Sky for all VM shortfalls
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote