View Single Post
Old 12-05-2011, 10:19   #86
muppetman11
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
Comparing VM to a supermarket doesn't really work. It's more comparable to gas and electricity suppliers. Prices go up for the services they provide but it doesn't mean you will get more in return.
How is it more comparable to Gas and Electricity Suppliers ?

Example If I get dual fuel from Scottish Power what's the difference from getting it from another supplier COST

This doesn't work in the world of TV though , Den has XL , Sky Movies and Sport , Premium HD and TIVO which by my estimates costs £64.00 for TV alone when comparing he is naturally going to compare to Sky who carry a lot wider channel range , so when prices go up he expects to see more , and rightly so.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote